Monday, March 9, 2009
The Co-Sleepover
I have a friend who has a family sleepover almost every night. (Yes, it’s the same friend who doesn’t own a tv and yes, this friend also keeps chickens in our inner-ring suburb, but that’s neither here nor there). That’s four - two adults, two children - to her queen-sized bed. That may sound uncomfortable and almost crazy, but most parents I know end up sleeping at least three to a bed a couple of nights each week. The only real difference is, this friend saves herself from the disruption of bringing a little person into the bed in the middle of the night.
Co-sleeping - that’s the medical term for this kind of arrangement - has long been one of the most divisive issues among the great debates of parenting. Whether or not you’ll let baby into your bed is a decision akin to breast over bottle, nanny or not, and vaccinate or wait (strangely, oftentimes one’s leaning in one category is an excellent predictor of what side they’ll take on the other questions). The medical community continues to investigate the pros and cons of co-sleeping. I recently read a summary of just such a study (we know I don’t read the actual studies) on Slate.com.
Before I get to the study itself, let’s take a closer look at the issue. What’s the benefit of sleeping with baby? Well, as Sydney Speisel (pediatrician and summarizer) explains it "the people who favor bed sharing believe that it promotes successful breast feeding, strengthens mother-child bonding, and may even allow parents to detect and halt Sudden Infant Death Syndrome." On the downside (which is where most pediatricians come out on this issue), co-sleeping engenders significant risks such as strangulation and suffocation; baby can be trapped in pillows and blankets or tired parents may accidentally roll over baby. I’d like to add a few thoughts to the debate. While they may not have been explored scientifically, these points are so deeply rooted in anecdotal evidence and well, fact that they really should be seen as integral to any parents decision about co-sleeping. First, co-sleeping is perhaps the most potent and reliable form of birth control. Nobody is getting it on with junior in the bed. Baby-in-bed as insurance against any kind of late night action may not be a plus for most dads, but I can pretty much guarantee that it offers immeasurable bonuses for their wives. An even bigger plus for co-sleeping is the fact that it involves sleep. That’s right, co-sleeping allows many parents to get more rest than they would with baby tucked safely into his own crib (in his own room). And I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to argue that a well-rested parent is a much safer parent throughout the day than an exhausted one.
So when doctors looked at two decades worth of infant mortality patterns in the United States, they found that more and more babies were dying of accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed, and for a lot of those babies, death occurred in co-sleeping situations. Most of those babies died when sleeping mom or dad rolled over them. But, says Speisel, that’s pretty much all the study says, "it doesn’t really give us the answer about the safety or risk of co-sleeping - it just raises enough questions to make us very nervous" Or very tired.
So what should we do with this information? Speisel suggests that letting the baby sleep in an "outrigger" device might help (not a boat, one of those three sided bassinets that attaches to the bed). And warns that parents shouldn’t "even think of bed sharing if [they] have been taking any medication, including antihistamines, which might make [them] sleep more deeply, or if [they] have been drinking an alcoholic beverage.
That sounds reasonable, but it doesn’t tell us who wins, my friend who’s still sleeping with her kids, or me who strapped my firstborn into her infant carrier to sleep every night? Wait, that’s obvious right?
Except that my friend gets an uninterrupted seven hours of sleep on a regular basis and I am up every hour and a half shuffling between bedrooms trying to talk small people back into their own beds at least a couple of nights every week.
Herein lies the real problem with this study. It only accounts for the babies that didn’t survive co-sleeping. It tells us nothing about all the other infants, both the ones that snuggled with their parents every night and the ones that went to their own, lonely cribs. Except we don’t really need a study to tell us, that every single one of those kids winds up in mom and dad’s bed at some point… in the night.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Okay, you know I think all of your posts are brilliant, but I find this one to be especially relevant to me.
I have no philosophical opposition to co-sleeping, it's just never been for me. I have always co-slept with a newborn who nurses frequently, but move baby to a crib at 2 or 3 months or so. I have 3 children who always slept wonderfully in their cribs and who NEVER end up in our bed.
BUT. Now I have this fourth baby. She was an excellent sleeper very early on, slept 10 or 12 hours at a stretch in her crib at night until about 4 months of age or so. She started waking at night, and I made the mistake of bringing her to bed with me, where I could nurse her and we'd both be back to sleep within minutes. For a while, this was fine. She slept more than nursed, I got enough sleep to function. But gradually, she's become more demanding, waking and wanting to nurse more frequently, and I'm only sleeping in stretches of an hour or two at a time. I am a light sleeper and I don't drink, so I don't worry much about rolling over on her, but I'm exhausted constantly.
So, my dilemma is to move her back to her crib, then have to actually GET UP when she wants to nurse at night, or just keep her in bed and hope she grows out of this habit? Neither way sounds very appealing to me.
I'm not sure where I went wrong, but you're right about it being effective birth control!
i loved co-sleeping with my little ones and ocassionally still do. for the most part they sleep in their bed together (so they won't be lonely). i got a good nights sleep from the time my babies were 2 weeks old and ever since. i never took any meds while co-sleeping because i was also breastfeeding (can't take many meds while doing that). anyway, i highly recommend it!
We co-sleep with our daughter and have since she was born. We do have a king size bed, which helps. I can't imagine 4 people in a queen bed. I have friends who co-sleep...quite a few friends. It's a wonderful thing. I love having my daughter next to me.
As far as those studies go, they don't look at the underlying reasons. The question is, were the suffocations caused by traditional co-sleepers or did a parent who had to much to drink fall asleep with the baby in the bed. These are two very different things.
Great discussion! I like to use clear terms. Co-sleeping is simply sleeping in close proximate space to each other. Bed sharing is sharing the same bed. Room sharing is sharing the same room.
Most professionals are very much in favor of room sharing. Provides easy access for breastfeeding moms as well as quick response times to baby's needs. Bed Sharing is a little more of a problem.
It's absolutely true that most babies live despite sleeping in what in the U.S. is an unsafe environment for an infant.
The biggest issue is not your friend who plans to bed share. She has probably thought it through and done what she can to create a safer environment for the baby. The issue is with the chaotic sleeping that occurs when a desperate-for-sleep mom brings her baby into bed without thought for anything other than a few minutes of uninterupted sleep. Those are the times when baby is probably at the greatest risk.
If you must bed share, remove all soft bedding from the bed. The better answer is keep baby close in his or her own crib and bring him into your bed for play time and snuggle time when you're awake.
Post a Comment